Pennant Investors LP 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

ReadyPennant Investors LP

Sign in to clone a new branch from the selected plan, then continue optimizing in the new branch.

OFFICIAL
USER BRANCHES
Back to funds

Baseline

Analysis messages
Branch:
Baselinetested
Strategy Q&A reference3 reference Q&A

Pre-generated Q&A about this fund. Use as reference context for your own analysis.

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Following Baseline means accepting the manager's disclosed sizing almost directly. Here that means high concentration in a short list of holdings: top 5 52.63%, top 10 81.85%, top 20 99.99%, with SATS 19.40%, MSFT 9.94%, SOLS 8.28%, PRM 8.00%, GOOGL 7.01%, AMZN 6.80%. The baseline result is return 6.56%, alpha -4.29%, beta 0.84, Sharpe 0.42, Sortino 0.54, max drawdown -44.20%. That is the right reference case, but it is not automatically the safest case because the largest names and sector mix (Communication Services 26.41%, Information Technology 20.57%, Industrials 19.67%, Materials 16.28%) still dominate the realized path.

↳Compare Baseline concentration and drawdown with each screen.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The period rows show the character of the baseline. The strongest relative period was 2023-09-30 (14.66% vs SPY 10.11%, excess 4.55%, turnover 12.33%); the weakest was 2024-03-31 (-6.87% vs SPY 2.31%, excess -9.18%, turnover 14.49%). The latest rows (2025-03-31 (5.28% vs SPY 9.22%, excess -3.94%, turnover 9.15%); 2025-06-30 (0.82% vs SPY 4.20%, excess -3.38%, turnover 15.74%); 2025-09-30 (0.23% vs SPY 1.49%, excess -1.26%, turnover 8.63%)) show whether recent results are confirming or reversing the long-term profile.

↳Rank recent baseline periods by excess return and turnover.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

Before accepting Baseline, I would inspect three things: whether SATS 19.40%, MSFT 9.94%, SOLS 8.28%, PRM 8.00% still have current theses, whether recent changes such as no large named moves and no large named moves indicate a shift, and whether max drawdown of -44.20% is acceptable for the user's risk budget.

↳Review the largest baseline holdings and explain whether each still deserves its weight.
Sign in to chat with AI about this fund's strategies, holdings, and risks.
Sign in to start chatting…
Reference any strategy or data point on this page.