XLY — XLY | S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector ETF 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

ReadyXLY | S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector ETF · Michael Riley

Sign in to clone a new branch from the selected plan, then continue optimizing in the new branch.

OFFICIAL
USER BRANCHES
Back to funds

Baseline

Analysis messages
Branch:
Baselinetested
Strategy Q&A reference3 reference Q&A

Pre-generated Q&A about this fund. Use as reference context for your own analysis.

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Following the baseline means accepting a very top-heavy discretionary portfolio with little optimization benefit. The top 5 holdings are 57.74%, top 10 are 70.69%, and top 20 are 85.44%, with AMZN at 22.95% and TSLA at 20.76% as the dominant risks. In the baseline artifact, annualized return is 12.94% and total return is 233.36%, but alpha is -1.08 and beta is 1.09, so investors got strong absolute compounding without meaningful benchmark outperformance. The artifact also notes 7,648 trades and total estimated cost of 1.5332, so even a plain replication still involves implementation drag over time.

Show the baseline’s concentration and cost profile next to the combo equal-weight screen.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The recent baseline trade-off is best illustrated by the sharp loss in 2025-01-31 and 2025-09-30 versus the rebound in 2025-04-30 and 2025-07-31. The baseline lost -8.73% in 2025-01-31 against SPY’s -2.79% and lost -2.50% in 2025-09-30 against SPY’s +2.05%, showing how concentration can hurt badly in weak months. But it also gained +8.40% in 2025-04-30 versus SPY’s +6.28% and +4.57% in 2025-07-31 versus SPY’s +2.05%, showing the upside when discretionary leaders rebound. Those swings fit the baseline beta of 1.09 and max drawdown of -39.39%.

Plot those four periods and break out which top holdings likely drove the outperformance or underperformance.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

The next check should be whether you are comfortable with concentration, drawdown, and negative alpha all at once. The baseline has top-5 concentration of 57.74%, beta of 1.09, alpha of -1.08, and max drawdown of -39.39%, so the portfolio is not giving clear excess return for the single-name and cyclical risk it takes. Users should also inspect the two biggest holdings, AMZN and TSLA, because they together account for 43.71% of assets and can overwhelm the rest of the basket. Finally, compare that profile with the combo equal-weight screen, which improved total return to 250.20 and alpha to +0.64, even though it also increased drawdown to -45.30%.

Compare baseline versus combo equal-weight on concentration, alpha, drawdown, and top holdings side by side.
Sign in to chat with AI about this fund's strategies, holdings, and risks.
Sign in to start chatting…
Reference any strategy or data point on this page.