Basic Value Screen
Select holdings using PE, PB, P/FCF, and EV/EBITDA, targeting roughly one quarter of each period's original member count and no more than 20 names; when a period has over 100 members, pre-rank to the top 50 first.
AI Summary
Highly concentrated small-value consumer staples portfolio with defensive beta, but weak backtest returns and deeper drawdowns than the original screen.
Portfolio Snapshot
Current optimized weights for the selected default session.
| Symbol | Name | Sector | Weight | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGT | Target Corporation | Consumer Staples | 20.00% | +16.28 |
| MO | Altria Group, Inc. | Consumer Staples | 20.00% | +15.41 |
| DG | Dollar General Corporation | Consumer Staples | 12.95% | +11.31 |
| KHC | The Kraft Heinz Company | Consumer Staples | 11.26% | +9.92 |
| GIS | General Mills, Inc. | Consumer Staples | 10.55% | +9.33 |
| SJM | The J. M. Smucker Company | Consumer Staples | 7.59% | +6.90 |
| TAP | Molson Coors Beverage Company | Consumer Staples | 6.32% | +5.85 |
| CAG | Conagra Brands, Inc. | Consumer Staples | 6.16% | +5.72 |
| CPB | The Campbell's Company | Consumer Staples | 5.17% | +4.90 |
Sector Exposure
- Consumer Staples100.00%
Weight Changes
Notable position adjustments in the latest snapshot.
- TGTTarget Corporation20.00% (+16.28)
- MOAltria Group, Inc.20.00% (+15.41)
- DGDollar General Corporation12.95% (+11.31)
- KHCThe Kraft Heinz Company11.26% (+9.92)
- GISGeneral Mills, Inc.10.55% (+9.33)
- SJMThe J. M. Smucker Company7.59% (+6.90)
- TAPMolson Coors Beverage Company6.32% (+5.85)
- CAGConagra Brands, Inc.6.16% (+5.72)
- CPBThe Campbell's Company5.17% (+4.90)
Performance vs Benchmark
Strategy NAV vs benchmark — hover for exact values.
Alpha Trend
Excess return vs benchmark over time.
Drawdown Trend
Underwater curve and peak drawdown marker.
Turnover Trend
Per-period turnover with average reference.
Strategy Comparison
All four default strategies side-by-side.
| Strategy | Annualized | Alpha | Sharpe | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 5.07% | -2.08% | 0.41 | -24.95% |
| Momentum Screen | 5.57% | -0.89% | 0.43 | -29.00% |
| Basic Value Screen | -0.84% | -7.08% | 0.04 | -31.76% |
| Combo Equal Screen | 8.30% | 0.14% | 0.51 | -24.23% |
vs Baseline: Annualized -5.91 · Alpha -4.99 · Sharpe -0.37
Recent Periods
Per-period performance vs benchmark.
| Period | Strategy | Benchmark | Excess | Turnover | Trades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-31 | 0.55% | 3.75% | -3.20 | 21.62 | 10 |
| 2025-06-30 | 3.68% | 2.69% | +0.99 | 41.23 | 11 |
| 2025-07-31 | 3.24% | 2.05% | +1.19 | 20.14 | 10 |
| 2025-08-31 | -2.85% | 3.66% | -6.51 | 43.00 | 10 |
| 2025-09-30 | -3.58% | 2.05% | -5.63 | 23.82 | 10 |
| 2025-10-31 | 3.04% | 0.20% | +2.84 | 4.56 | 9 |
| 2025-11-30 | -1.22% | 0.99% | -2.21 | 29.14 | 10 |
| 2025-12-31 | 6.39% | 1.47% | +4.92 | 29.61 | 10 |
| 2026-01-31 | 4.71% | -1.35% | +6.06 | 1.73 | 9 |
| 2026-02-28 | -8.12% | -7.93% | -0.20 | 23.51 | 10 |
| 2026-03-31 | -2.63% | 9.42% | -12.05 | 60.88 | 10 |
| 2026-04-30 | -3.71% | 4.11% | -7.81 | 40.09 | 9 |
Strategy Q&A
Pre-generated questions and answers about this strategy.
- value13FChat AI
Are the selected value names mean-reversion opportunities or possible value traps?
Recent period evidence is mixed by design: the strongest period was 2026-01-31 (4.71% strategy return, -1.35% benchmark, 6.06% excess, 1.73% turnover), and the weakest was 2026-03-31 (-2.63% strategy return, 9.42% benchmark, -12.05% excess, 60.88% turnover). With turnover around 25.55% and latest changes of TGT increase to 20.00%; MO increase to 20.00%; DG increase to 12.95%, the user should verify whether each selected name has improving fundamentals, not just a low multiple.
strategyViews.basic-value-screen.periodPerformancestrategyViews.basic-value-screen.latestChanges↳ Identify whether each selected value name has improving fundamentals or only a low valuation multiple.
- value13FChat AI
Did the value screen improve valuation exposure without hurting return quality?
The value screen reports return -0.84%, alpha -7.08%, beta 0.52, Sharpe 0.04, Sortino 0.05, and max drawdown -31.76%. Relative to baseline, annualized return changed by -5.91%, alpha changed by -4.99%, Sharpe changed by -0.37, Sortino changed by -0.48, drawdown worsened by 6.80%. The key question is whether lower valuation exposure is worth any sacrifice in growth, momentum, or quality leadership.
strategyViews.basic-value-screen.metricsstrategyViews.baseline.metrics↳ Review PE, PB, FCF yield, return quality, and momentum for the value-screen names.
- value13FChat AI
Which names did the value screen keep for XLP | S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector ETF, and what makes the result different from baseline?
The value screen currently keeps TGT (Target Corporation) 20.00%, MO (Altria Group, Inc.) 20.00%, DG (Dollar General Corporation) 12.95%, KHC (The Kraft Heinz Company) 11.26%, and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) 10.55%. It still overlaps the baseline through MO, and reshapes sector exposure toward Consumer Staples 100.00%. This should be read as a valuation-sensitive subset of the disclosed universe, not as a full replacement for the original mandate.
strategyViews.basic-value-screen.topHoldingsstrategyViews.basic-value-screen.sectorWeights↳ Compare value-screen holdings with baseline holdings by valuation, sector, and weight change.
Other strategies for this fund
Baseline
Track disclosed holdings with the standard reporting lag and no active reweighting.
Momentum Screen
Select holdings by historically observable momentum, targeting roughly one quarter of each period's original member count and no more than 20 names; when a period has over 100 members, pre-rank to the top 50 first.
Combo Equal Screen
Filter for large-cap, quality, and low-leverage holdings, rank by composite quality/value/size score, keep the top 20 names, and equal-weight the selected names.