Optimization Strategybasic-value-screen
Run this strategy in workspace
Quant Analysis ResultBasic Value ScreenRun Ready

Basic Value Screen

Select holdings using PE, PB, P/FCF, and EV/EBITDA, targeting roughly one quarter of each period's original member count and no more than 20 names; when a period has over 100 members, pre-rank to the top 50 first.

AI Summary

Concentrated small-value portfolio with strong Financials tilt, decent long-run returns, and weaker risk-adjusted results after optimization.

Annualized Return
13.72%
Annualized return
Alpha
1.28%
Active return
Sharpe
0.73
Risk-adjusted return
Beta
0.93
Market sensitivity
Max Drawdown
-34.41%
Maximum drawdown
Top 5
62.06%
Top-5 concentration
Top 10
87.06%
Top-10 concentration
Top 20
100.00%
Top-20 concentration

Portfolio Snapshot

Current optimized weights for the selected default session.

SymbolNameSectorWeightDiff
GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Financials16.53%+15.17
NEMNewmont CorporationMaterials14.75%+13.54
CCitigroup Inc.Financials12.32%+11.30
MSMorgan StanleyFinancials11.36%+10.42
SCHWThe Charles Schwab CorporationFinancials7.10%+6.51
BKThe Bank of New York Mellon CorporationFinancials5.96%+5.47
MOAltria Group, Inc.Consumer Staples5.89%+5.41
GMGeneral Motors CompanyConsumer Discretionary4.89%+4.49
HCAHCA Healthcare, Inc.Health Care4.40%+4.04
AEPAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc.Utilities3.86%+3.54
DGDollar General CorporationConsumer Staples2.20%+2.01
STTState Street CorporationFinancials2.03%+1.87
NTRSNorthern Trust CorporationFinancials1.53%+1.40
ATOAtmos Energy CorporationUtilities1.48%+1.35
FOXAFox CorporationCommunication Services1.13%+1.04
EVRGEvergy, Inc.Utilities1.08%+0.99
NINiSource Inc.Utilities1.08%+0.99
LLoews CorporationFinancials0.91%+0.84
LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.Industrials0.89%+0.82
IVZInvesco Ltd.Financials0.61%+0.56

Sector Exposure

  • Financials58.35%
  • Materials14.75%
  • Consumer Staples8.09%
  • Utilities7.50%
  • Consumer Discretionary4.89%
  • Health Care4.40%
  • Communication Services1.13%
  • Industrials0.89%

Weight Changes

Notable position adjustments in the latest snapshot.

  • GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.16.53% (+15.17)
  • NEMNewmont Corporation14.75% (+13.54)
  • CCitigroup Inc.12.32% (+11.30)
  • MSMorgan Stanley11.36% (+10.42)
  • SCHWThe Charles Schwab Corporation7.10% (+6.51)
  • BKThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation5.96% (+5.47)
  • MOAltria Group, Inc.5.89% (+5.41)
  • GMGeneral Motors Company4.89% (+4.49)
  • HCAHCA Healthcare, Inc.4.40% (+4.04)
  • AEPAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc.3.86% (+3.54)
  • DGDollar General Corporation2.20% (+2.01)
  • STTState Street Corporation2.03% (+1.87)
  • NTRSNorthern Trust Corporation1.53% (+1.40)
  • ATOAtmos Energy Corporation1.48% (+1.35)
  • FOXAFox Corporation1.13% (+1.04)
  • EVRGEvergy, Inc.1.08% (+0.99)
  • NINiSource Inc.1.08% (+0.99)
  • LLoews Corporation0.91% (+0.84)
  • LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.0.89% (+0.82)
  • IVZInvesco Ltd.0.61% (+0.56)

Performance vs Benchmark

Strategy NAV vs benchmark — hover for exact values.

Basic Value ScreenBenchmark

Alpha Trend

Excess return vs benchmark over time.

Alpha (positive)Alpha (negative)

Drawdown Trend

Underwater curve and peak drawdown marker.

Max DD: -34.41%(Mar 20)

Turnover Trend

Per-period turnover with average reference.

Avg turnover: 30.16Peak: 117.36

Strategy Comparison

All four default strategies side-by-side.

StrategyAnnualizedAlphaSharpeMax DD
Baseline20.86%6.03%1.06-29.77%
Momentum Screen19.74%5.60%0.89-30.45%
Basic Value Screen13.72%1.28%0.73-34.41%
Combo Equal Screen16.45%2.16%0.83-31.00%

vs Baseline: Annualized -7.15 · Alpha -4.75 · Sharpe -0.33

Recent Periods

Per-period performance vs benchmark.

PeriodStrategyBenchmarkExcessTurnoverTrades
2025-05-317.11%3.75%+3.375.0621
2025-06-303.85%2.69%+1.1615.6921
2025-07-314.44%2.05%+2.3929.6723
2025-08-313.42%3.66%-0.2419.4722
2025-09-30-2.96%2.05%-5.0153.2727
2025-10-312.59%0.20%+2.3917.1922
2025-11-304.59%0.99%+3.605.6721
2025-12-310.95%1.47%-0.525.7621
2026-01-31-0.78%-1.35%+0.5714.5722
2026-02-28-3.57%-7.93%+4.3619.6422
2026-03-3120.35%9.42%+10.93117.3631
2026-04-300.39%4.11%-3.7259.5022

Strategy Q&A

Pre-generated questions and answers about this strategy.

  • value13FChat AI

    Which names did the value screen keep for SPMO | S&P 500 Momentum ETF, and what makes the result different from baseline?

    The value screen currently keeps GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) 16.53%, NEM (Newmont Corporation) 14.75%, C 12.32%, MS (Morgan Stanley) 11.36%, and SCHW (The Charles Schwab Corporation) 7.10%. It has little overlap with the baseline top 10, and reshapes sector exposure toward Financials 58.35%, Materials 14.75%, and Consumer Staples 8.09%. This should be read as a valuation-sensitive subset of the disclosed universe, not as a full replacement for the original mandate.

    strategyViews.basic-value-screen.topHoldingsstrategyViews.basic-value-screen.sectorWeights

    Compare value-screen holdings with baseline holdings by valuation, sector, and weight change.

  • value13FChat AI

    Did the value screen reduce concentration or simply rotate into another concentrated bet?

    The selected value book has top 5 62.06%, top 10 87.06%, top 20 100.00%, versus baseline top 5 38.75%, top 10 55.03%, top 20 71.56%. Its largest positions are GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) 16.53%, NEM (Newmont Corporation) 14.75%, C 12.32%, and MS (Morgan Stanley) 11.36%, so concentration risk still needs to be reviewed even if the names look cheaper.

    strategyViews.basic-value-screen.concentrationstrategyViews.baseline.concentration

    Compare value-screen top weights with baseline top weights and identify the largest reallocations.

  • value13FChat AI

    Are the selected value names mean-reversion opportunities or possible value traps?

    Recent period evidence is mixed by design: the strongest period was 2026-03-31 (20.35% strategy return, 9.42% benchmark, 10.93% excess, 117.36% turnover), and the weakest was 2025-09-30 (-2.96% strategy return, 2.05% benchmark, -5.01% excess, 53.27% turnover). With turnover around 30.16% and latest changes of GS increase to 16.53%; NEM increase to 14.75%; C increase to 12.32%, the user should verify whether each selected name has improving fundamentals, not just a low multiple.

    strategyViews.basic-value-screen.periodPerformancestrategyViews.basic-value-screen.latestChanges

    Identify whether each selected value name has improving fundamentals or only a low valuation multiple.

Other strategies for this fund

This content is for informational and research purposes only and is not investment advice.