XLRE — XLRE | S&P 500 Real Estate Sector ETF 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

ReadyXLRE | S&P 500 Real Estate Sector ETF · Karl Schneider

Sign in to clone a new branch from the selected plan, then continue optimizing in the new branch.

OFFICIAL
USER BRANCHES
Back to funds

Baseline

Analysis messages
Branch:
Baselinetested
Strategy Q&A reference3 reference Q&A

Pre-generated Q&A about this fund. Use as reference context for your own analysis.

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline means accepting a concentrated REIT-heavy portfolio with weak benchmark-relative performance. The baseline top 10 holdings account for 58.62% of assets, top 20 reach 85.98%, and sector exposure is effectively all Real Estate in the strategy view. The largest positions are WELL at 10.04%, PLD at 9.34%, and AMT at 6.48%. In return terms, the baseline delivered 3.32% annualized return and 38.1% total return, but alpha was -6.27 and max drawdown reached -38.51%, so the investor gets a high-conviction real estate sleeve rather than a diversified market-like portfolio.

Show me how much of the baseline’s risk comes from the top 10 REIT names versus the rest of the holdings.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The recent baseline periods show a pattern of occasional downside protection followed by repeated relative lag. The clearest positive stretch was 2025-01-31, when the portfolio returned 3.27% versus SPY at -2.79%, for +6.06% excess. But several later periods reversed that advantage: 2025-04-30 posted 0.85% versus SPY’s 6.28% (-5.43% excess), 2025-05-31 was -1.19% versus 3.75% (-4.94%), and 2025-09-30 was -3.11% versus 2.05% (-5.16%). Those swings help explain why beta stayed lower at 0.81, yet long-run alpha remained -6.27 and the Sharpe ratio stayed weak at 0.26.

Plot the baseline’s recent excess returns by month and highlight when lower beta actually helped versus when it did not.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

The next thing to inspect is whether the real estate concentration is worth the weak risk-adjusted record. The baseline already shows enough evidence to focus the review: top 10 concentration is 58.62%, Real Estate sector weight is 100.02% in the strategy view, annualized return is 3.32%, Sharpe is 0.26, and max drawdown is -38.51%. It is also useful to inspect implementation drag because the backtest logged 3,597 trades and 0.567 total estimated cost. Before accepting the baseline, a user should verify whether the biggest names like WELL, PLD, AMT, EQIX, and SPG are diversified enough across REIT subsectors to justify those drawdown and alpha numbers.

Break down the baseline by top holdings, REIT subsector mix, and implementation costs so I can judge if the concentration is acceptable.
Sign in to chat with AI about this fund's strategies, holdings, and risks.
Sign in to start chatting…
Reference any strategy or data point on this page.