Optimization Strategycombo-equal-screen
Run this strategy in workspace
Quant Analysis ResultCombo Equal ScreenRun Ready

Combo Equal Screen

Filter for large-cap, quality, and low-leverage holdings, rank by composite quality/value/size score, keep the top 20 names, and equal-weight the selected names.

AI Summary

High-return equal-weight screen with strong absolute gains, but higher beta, deeper drawdowns, and weaker risk-adjusted results than the original plan.

Annualized Return
24.09%
Annualized return
Alpha
-0.26%
Active return
Sharpe
1.23
Risk-adjusted return
Beta
1.13
Market sensitivity
Max Drawdown
-22.99%
Maximum drawdown
Top 5
25.00%
Top-5 concentration
Top 10
50.00%
Top-10 concentration
Top 20
100.00%
Top-20 concentration

Portfolio Snapshot

Current optimized weights for the selected default session.

SymbolNameSectorWeightDiff
FIXComfort Systems USA, Inc.Industrials5.00%+4.89
FASTFastenal CompanyIndustrials5.00%+4.92
NVRNVR, Inc.Consumer Discretionary5.00%+4.97
ACNAccenture plcInformation Technology5.00%+4.82
LULUlululemon athletica inc.Consumer Discretionary5.00%+4.98
PGRThe Progressive CorporationFinancials5.00%+4.82
LRCXLam Research CorporationInformation Technology5.00%+4.42
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.Information Technology5.00%+4.45
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.Communication Services5.00%+2.90
MSFTMicrosoft CorporationInformation Technology5.00%+0.14
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Communication Services5.00%-1.61
ALLThe Allstate CorporationFinancials5.00%+4.91
NVDANVIDIA CorporationInformation Technology5.00%-3.25
DECKDeckers Outdoor CorporationConsumer Discretionary5.00%+4.98
UBERUber Technologies, Inc.Industrials5.00%+4.76
ANETArista Networks, Inc.Information Technology5.00%+4.77
EMEEMCOR Group, Inc.Industrials5.00%+4.93
EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc.Industrials5.00%+4.97
MUMicron Technology, Inc.Information Technology5.00%+3.67
COSTCostco Wholesale CorporationConsumer Staples5.00%+4.29

Sector Exposure

  • Information Technology35.00%
  • Industrials25.00%
  • Consumer Discretionary15.00%
  • Financials10.00%
  • Communication Services10.00%
  • Consumer Staples5.00%

Weight Changes

Notable position adjustments in the latest snapshot.

  • FIXComfort Systems USA, Inc.5.00% (+4.89)
  • FASTFastenal Company5.00% (+4.92)
  • NVRNVR, Inc.5.00% (+4.97)
  • ACNAccenture plc5.00% (+4.82)
  • LULUlululemon athletica inc.5.00% (+4.98)
  • PGRThe Progressive Corporation5.00% (+4.82)
  • LRCXLam Research Corporation5.00% (+4.42)
  • AMATApplied Materials, Inc.5.00% (+4.45)
  • METAMeta Platforms, Inc.5.00% (+2.90)
  • MSFTMicrosoft Corporation5.00% (+0.14)
  • GOOGLAlphabet Inc.5.00% (-1.61)
  • ALLThe Allstate Corporation5.00% (+4.91)
  • NVDANVIDIA Corporation5.00% (-3.25)
  • DECKDeckers Outdoor Corporation5.00% (+4.98)
  • UBERUber Technologies, Inc.5.00% (+4.76)
  • ANETArista Networks, Inc.5.00% (+4.77)
  • EMEEMCOR Group, Inc.5.00% (+4.93)
  • EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc.5.00% (+4.97)
  • MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.00% (+3.67)
  • COSTCostco Wholesale Corporation5.00% (+4.29)

Performance vs Benchmark

Strategy NAV vs benchmark — hover for exact values.

Combo Equal ScreenBenchmark

Alpha Trend

Excess return vs benchmark over time.

Alpha (positive)Alpha (negative)

Drawdown Trend

Underwater curve and peak drawdown marker.

Max DD: -22.99%(Apr 25)

Turnover Trend

Per-period turnover with average reference.

Avg turnover: 18.14Peak: 37.56

Strategy Comparison

All four default strategies side-by-side.

StrategyAnnualizedAlphaSharpeMax DD
Baseline21.38%0.04%1.37-18.86%
Momentum Screen22.03%0.17%1.17-22.18%
Basic Value Screen11.95%-1.58%0.82-18.43%
Combo Equal Screen24.09%-0.26%1.23-22.99%

vs Baseline: Annualized +2.71 · Alpha -0.30 · Sharpe -0.14

Recent Periods

Per-period performance vs benchmark.

PeriodStrategyBenchmarkExcessTurnoverTrades
2025-05-313.19%3.75%-0.557.0720
2025-06-301.29%2.69%-1.4037.5623
2025-07-313.32%2.05%+1.277.1820
2025-08-313.45%3.66%-0.206.2220
2025-09-30-0.22%2.05%-2.2736.5023
2025-10-311.75%0.20%+1.5619.7721
2025-11-303.64%0.99%+2.6518.9921
2025-12-317.10%1.47%+5.6224.1222
2026-01-31-0.16%-1.35%+1.198.6820
2026-02-28-10.38%-7.93%-2.4628.7022
2026-03-3110.45%9.42%+1.044.9420
2026-04-302.31%4.11%-1.8021.9321

Strategy Q&A

Pre-generated questions and answers about this strategy.

  • combo13FChat AI

    What trade-off should a user understand before choosing the combo equal-weight screen?

    The trade-off is that Combo Equal Screen may improve or smooth the original portfolio, but it can also discard meaningful manager sizing. The best period was 2025-12-31 (7.10% strategy return, 1.47% benchmark, 5.62% excess, 24.12% turnover), and the weakest was 2026-02-28 (-10.38% strategy return, -7.93% benchmark, -2.46% excess, 28.70% turnover). With return 24.09%, alpha -0.26%, beta 1.13, Sharpe 1.23, Sortino 1.77, and max drawdown -22.99% and turnover around 18.14%, the screen should be chosen only if the user prefers the rules-based basket over the original concentration pattern.

    strategyViews.combo-equal-screen.periodPerformancestrategyViews.combo-equal-screen.metrics

    Stress-test the combo screen under higher trading cost, weaker sector leadership, and larger drawdowns.

  • combo13FChat AI

    How did the combo equal-weight screen change portfolio structure versus the baseline?

    Combo Equal Screen changes structure by selecting FIX (Comfort Systems USA, Inc.) 5.00%, FAST (Fastenal Company) 5.00%, NVR 5.00%, ACN (Accenture plc) 5.00%, LULU (lululemon athletica inc.) 5.00%, PGR (The Progressive Corporation) 5.00%, LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) 5.00%, and AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) 5.00%. That produces top 5 25.00%, top 10 50.00%, top 20 100.00% and sector exposure of Information Technology 35.00%, Industrials 25.00%, Consumer Discretionary 15.00%, and Financials 10.00%. Compared with baseline concentration of top 5 30.72%, top 10 40.65%, top 20 50.14%, this is less about copying original sizing and more about testing a cleaner rules-based basket.

    strategyViews.combo-equal-screen.topHoldingsstrategyViews.combo-equal-screen.concentration

    Compare combo weights with Baseline weights and identify the largest reallocations.

  • combo13FChat AI

    Was the combo screen's result driven more by stock selection or by weight redistribution?

    The combo result appears to be a mix of stock selection and weight redistribution. It selected FIX (Comfort Systems USA, Inc.) 5.00%, FAST (Fastenal Company) 5.00%, NVR 5.00%, ACN (Accenture plc) 5.00%, LULU (lululemon athletica inc.) 5.00%, and PGR (The Progressive Corporation) 5.00% and delivered return 24.09%, alpha -0.26%, beta 1.13, Sharpe 1.23, Sortino 1.77, and max drawdown -22.99%. Versus baseline, annualized return changed by 2.71%, alpha changed by -0.30%, Sharpe changed by -0.14, Sortino changed by -0.06, drawdown worsened by 4.13%. The selected-name list and changed weights are the first places to check whether performance came from better stocks or simply different sizing.

    strategyViews.combo-equal-screen.topHoldingsstrategyViews.combo-equal-screen.metrics

    Separate the combo result into selected names, weight changes, and return contribution.

Other strategies for this fund

This content is for informational and research purposes only and is not investment advice.